calibration parameter
Calibrating CNNs for Lifelong Learning
We present an approach for lifelong/continual learning of convolutional neural networks (CNN) that does not suffer from the problem of catastrophic forgetting when moving from one task to the other. We show that the activation maps generated by the CNN trained on the old task can be calibrated using very few calibration parameters, to become relevant to the new task. Based on this, we calibrate the activation maps produced by each network layer using spatial and channel-wise calibration modules and train only these calibration parameters for each new task in order to perform lifelong learning. Our calibration modules introduce significantly less computation and parameters as compared to the approaches that dynamically expand the network. Our approach is immune to catastrophic forgetting since we store the task-adaptive calibration parameters, which contain all the task-specific knowledge and is exclusive to each task. Further, our approach does not require storing data samples from the old tasks, which is done by many replay based methods. We perform extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets (SVHN, CIFAR, ImageNet, and MS-Celeb), all of which show substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods (e.g., a 29% absolute increase in accuracy on CIFAR-100 with 10 classes at a time).
RLCNet: An end-to-end deep learning framework for simultaneous online calibration of LiDAR, RADAR, and Camera
Cholakkal, Hafeez Husain, Arrigoni, Stefano, Braghin, Francesco
UTONOMOUS vehicles are poised to revolutionize transportation by improving road safety, reducing traffic congestion, and increasing mobility convenience [1]. To perceive and interact with their environment accurately, these vehicles rely on a combination of complementary sensors, including LiDAR, RADAR, and cameras. Each sensor offers unique advantages: cameras capture rich visual detail, LiDAR provides precise 3D spatial measurements, and RADAR performs robustly under adverse weather conditions [2]. Sensor fusion leverages the strengths of these modalities to ensure redundancy and resilience, allowing the vehicle to maintain accurate perception in diverse and dynamic environments [3]. A critical component of sensor fusion is extrinsic calibration, which involves the determination of the relative positions and orientations of sensors in a common coordinate frame. However, maintaining precise calibration over time is a persistent challenge. Factors such as mechanical vibrations, temperature changes, and minor collisions can lead to sensor drift, where even small misalignments in sensor orientation or position can result in substantial perception errors, potentially compromising vehicle safety.
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Delft (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Lombardy > Milan (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Information Technology > Modeling & Simulation (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.68)
Calibrating CNNs for Lifelong Learning
We present an approach for lifelong/continual learning of convolutional neural networks (CNN) that does not suffer from the problem of catastrophic forgetting when moving from one task to the other. We show that the activation maps generated by the CNN trained on the old task can be calibrated using very few calibration parameters, to become relevant to the new task.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > India > Uttar Pradesh > Kanpur (0.04)
- Research Report (0.68)
- Instructional Material (0.53)
CarBoN: Calibrated Best-of-N Sampling Improves Test-time Reasoning
Tang, Yung-Chen, Chen, Pin-Yu, Cavallaro, Andrea
Allocating more computation during inference time (test-time scaling) improves language model performance, especially for reasoning tasks. To address this inefficiency, we introduce a general test-time calibration framework that adaptively modifies the model toward high-reward reasoning paths, with theoretical guarantees of improving the lower bound of expected reward under finite sampling, all without large language model (LLM) retraining. Within this framework, we propose CarBoN (Calibrated Best-of-N), a two-phase method that first explores the solution space and then learns a calibration of the logits via an input-specific temperature T and additive shift vector δ, guiding generation toward more reliable reasoning. Experiments on MA TH-500 and AIME-2024 show that CarBoN improves efficiency, with up to 4 fewer rollouts to reach the same accuracy, while often achieving higher accuracy under fixed budgets. We also analyze the complementary roles of T and δ in balancing output diversity and correctness, and demonstrate that the framework also generalizes to step-level sampling strategies such as beam search. Test-time scaling (TTS) is a practical alternative to ever-larger training, enabling models to "think longer" at inference by allocating additional computation to reasoning. As these studies suggest, TTS allows smaller LLMs to match or even outperform larger ones, providing a more cost-efficient and flexible inference strategy. Despite these benefits, simply increasing test-time compute does not guarantee optimal performance. Recent work has shown that inference without effective verification is often sub-optimal, as models may spend additional computation on low-quality reasoning paths (Setlur et al., 2025). To overcome this inefficiency, we propose a general test-time calibration framework that strategically reallocates the inference budget by leveraging feedback from a verifier or reward model during inference. Rather than treating generation as a fixed forward pass, the model adaptively steers toward high-reward (likely correct) regions, improving reasoning reliability under a fixed query budget. The reward is defined as the inverse distance to the target plus noise.
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.48)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Information Technology > Modeling & Simulation (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.68)
Unleashing the Power of Discrete-Time State Representation: Ultrafast Target-based IMU-Camera Spatial-Temporal Calibration
Song, Junlin, Richard, Antoine, Olivares-Mendez, Miguel
Visual-inertial fusion is crucial for a large amount of intelligent and autonomous applications, such as robot navigation and augmented reality. To bootstrap and achieve optimal state estimation, the spatial-temporal displacements between IMU and cameras must be calibrated in advance. Most existing calibration methods adopt continuous-time state representation, more specifically the B-spline. Despite these methods achieve precise spatial-temporal calibration, they suffer from high computational cost caused by continuous-time state representation. To this end, we propose a novel and extremely efficient calibration method that unleashes the power of discrete-time state representation. Moreover, the weakness of discrete-time state representation in temporal calibration is tackled in this paper. With the increasing production of drones, cellphones and other visual-inertial platforms, if one million devices need calibration around the world, saving one minute for the calibration of each device means saving 2083 work days in total. To benefit both the research and industry communities, our code will be open-source.
Calibrating CNNs for Lifelong Learning
We present an approach for lifelong/continual learning of convolutional neural networks (CNN) that does not suffer from the problem of catastrophic forgetting when moving from one task to the other. We show that the activation maps generated by the CNN trained on the old task can be calibrated using very few calibration parameters, to become relevant to the new task.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > India > Uttar Pradesh > Kanpur (0.04)
- Research Report (0.68)
- Instructional Material (0.53)
Should We Simultaneously Calibrate Multiple Computer Models?
Eweis-Labolle, Jonathan Tammer, Johnson, Tyler, Sun, Xiangyu, Bostanabad, Ramin
In an increasing number of applications designers have access to multiple computer models which typically have different levels of fidelity and cost. Traditionally, designers calibrate these models one at a time against some high-fidelity data (e.g., experiments). In this paper, we question this tradition and assess the potential of calibrating multiple computer models at the same time. To this end, we develop a probabilistic framework that is founded on customized neural networks (NNs) that are designed to calibrate an arbitrary number of computer models. In our approach, we (1) consider the fact that most computer models are multi-response and that the number and nature of calibration parameters may change across the models, and (2) learn a unique probability distribution for each calibration parameter of each computer model, (3) develop a loss function that enables our NN to emulate all data sources while calibrating the computer models, and (4) aim to learn a visualizable latent space where model-form errors can be identified. We test the performance of our approach on analytic and engineering problems to understand the potential advantages and pitfalls in simultaneous calibration of multiple computer models. Our method can improve predictive accuracy, however, it is prone to non-identifiability issues in higher-dimensional input spaces that are normally constrained by underlying physics.
Joint Magnetometer-IMU Calibration via Maximum A Posteriori Estimation
Huang, Chuan, Hendeby, Gustaf, Skog, Isaac
This paper presents a new approach for jointly calibrating magnetometers and inertial measurement units, focusing on improving calibration accuracy and computational efficiency. The proposed method formulates the calibration problem as a maximum a posteriori estimation problem, treating both the calibration parameters and orientation trajectory of the sensors as unknowns. This formulation enables efficient optimization with closed-form derivatives. The method is compared against two state-of-the-art approaches in terms of computational complexity and estimation accuracy. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves lower root mean square error in calibration parameters while maintaining competitive computational efficiency. Further validation through real-world experiments confirms the practical benefits of our approach: it effectively reduces position drift in a magnetic field-aided inertial navigation system by more than a factor of two on most datasets. Moreover, the proposed method calibrated 30 magnetometers in less than 2 minutes. The contributions include a new calibration method, an analysis of existing methods, and a comprehensive empirical evaluation. Datasets and algorithms are made publicly available to promote reproducible research.
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > Sweden (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)